D. PAYNE, Inactive, ENNID FERGUSON And you can LEE PAYNE, PLAINTIFFS By mistake, v

D. PAYNE, Inactive, ENNID FERGUSON And you can LEE PAYNE, PLAINTIFFS By mistake, v

On the January 20, 1950, Lena and you may R

¶0 Appeal because of the Heirs, etcetera. regarding R.D. Payne, Deceased, while others (defendants) regarding a wisdom quieting label to help you lands during the Executor out-of Estate of Lena Payne, inactive. Base of wisdom try one to beneath the factors the lands expressed of the Lena Payne to help you Roentgen.D. Payne was indeed acquired of the combined community out-of both into the meaning of 84 O.S. 1961 § 213 , Subd. dos. Affirmed.

¶step one This new Heirs, Executors, Directors, etc., from Roentgen.D. Payne, Dry, Ennid Ferguson and you may Lee Payne (defendants regarding the demo legal) attention regarding a wisdom made in favor of Alexander Linder Seay, Executor of your own Estate out of Lena Payne, Dry (plaintiff below) for which the brand new name so you’re able to an enormous system out of property try quieted into the plaintiff and you will up against the defendants. The latest parties could well be described by the its trial court designation or by-name.

¶2 The primary concern displayed inside attract is if brand new places had been obtained because of the mutual community out of Lena Payne and you will the woman 2nd partner Roentgen.D. Payne, as the provided regarding the 2nd Subdivision from 84 O.S. 1961 § 213 .

¶3 Lena Payne, formerly Seay, and you may Alexander Linder Seay, was basically to start with the new widow and man correspondingly of Oscar Seay, regarding just who it acquired, because of the heredity otherwise devise, a ranch composed of of numerous acres from home. Continue reading